This thread has been bookmarked. Visit your bookmarked threads to review.
Post a Reply to this Thread
How would you control a Bumblebee circulator in a pure TRV situation? (65 Posts)
How would you control a Bumblebee circulator in a pure TRV situation?In either a reverse return two pipe system or a home run setup I can understand the Alpha would sense the pressure change when a TRV opens and closes. How would a Bumblebee know a TRV opened in order to turn the pump on since you would be dispensing with thermostats?
Put in some sort of pressure differential sensing switch between supply and return?
John Barba, are you on here?
delta-T will work just fineAs the TRVs slow down the water flow through the radiators, the average return temperature will drop and the pump will slow down to supply less, maintaining ∆T.This post was edited by an admin on February 19, 2013 10:38 AM.
What if there is no longer any return flow to measure?On a closed home run branch there wouldn't be any returning water, would there? On the reverse return two pipe system the return would not be flowing if the only the first radiator on loop was calling for heat and then the TRV shot down. No water would be flowing back to boiler then.
Would a bypass be required to have flow temp to measure?
I haven't tried a BumbleBee yetbut I'm sure they have a way of dealing with it. I just pinged Steve Thompson on this.
ThanksI am really interested in this.
I wouldn't use delta tI would send one sensor to the radiator and use the set point function just set the temp you want at that radiator the bee will do the rest.... I'm not sure I'm thinking of the same type of system as you I use them for radiant and rad panel fhw .....
I think I have an answer - but...Good question. I think I have the answer but want to check with Mr. Barba and a few others first.
Stay tuned folks - we're on it. Get back to you shortly.
Thanks Steve!Thanks for all the great "How To" stuff on your website. Between Taco and Caleffi (and The Wall, of course), a person can learn a lot.
In A PureTRV situation I would be constant circulation based on outdoor temp. Pump comes on below WWSD and off at WWSD. If a panel rad application my radiator valves would be the type with built in bypasses.
The Bee is looking to maintain a delta-t and will do so. I wouldn't want it on/off. It runs at start for a full 3 minutes before it reacts unlike the VDT which was 30 seconds.
If cast rads, same thing, bypasses and constant circulation. The pump will react to the delta-t change and speed up or down depending on the needed flow and head required at a given moment.
Would be nice if the next version had 0-10VDC and the start time was field adjustable. Three minutes is a long time. Why the difference between a 30 sec on the older VDT and 3 minutes on the Bee?"The bitter taste of a poor installation remains much longer than the sweet taste of the lowest price."This post was edited by an admin on February 17, 2013 8:14 AM.
Delta PDelta P pumps were designed with this application in mind.
Here's the "buzz...."Hi gang --
This is sorta what I have in the lower level of my house. Panel rads with TRV's and a Bumblebee - with a minor variation. The panel rad in the family room -- largest load by far - has no TRV - that room runs off a thermostat. All the panel rads are piped with dedicated supply and return PEX runs off a valved manifold. There's retrofit radiant floor in my office - runs off the same manifold as the panel rads - and it operates off the family room thermostat as well.
The thing to remember about TRV's is that they modulate - they're usually either opening or closing- regulating flow through the radiator. This control method lends itself to "continuous circulation," primarily for electrical simplicity more than anything else. This application is pretty standard in Europe, and is what Delta-P circulators are designed for.
Would a Delta-T Bumblebee work in this situation? Well, why wouldn't it?
Let's say you decided to run it "continuously" (which kinda defeats to the purpose of "electrical efficiency," the most efficient circulator is the one that's off - but that's a different story for a different day). You program the BumbleBee for the Delta-T you want (20, 30, 40 - whatever you designed the system for), and then put the supply sensor on the supply piping, and the return sensor on the return piping - near the return side of the manifold and the turn it on.
The pump runs to establish the Delta-T you've programmed. With all the TRV's fully open - you're pulling a lot of BTU's out of the fluid. The return water temperature may be fairly low -- and the circulator will go faster. As TRV's close, or modulate towards closed, that means the radiators - and the system - need less flow. The return water temperature would start to increase - and the Bumblebee will slow down.
So what happens when it's warm out and you don't need much heat at the radiators? Well, if you have outdoor reset on the boiler, everything chugs along as it would if it were colder out - with one exception. The BumbleBee will run at even lower speeds when it's warmer out - like in late November - than when it's colder out, like in mid-January - and there's a Taco T-shirt in it for the first person who knows why!
If there's no outdoor reset, the TRV's won't open as much - to regulate flow through the radiator. Again, since there's not a lot of BTU's being taken out of the fluid, the Bumblebee will react accordingly. Will the pump dead-head if all the TRV's are closed? Yep - so will a Delta-P pump. Don't forget those things are always running, and the impeller is always turning - even when there's no flow required.
What will the Delta-T function do if all the TRV's are closed? That's a pretty rare occurrence, because TRV's aren't made to be "off," they're made to modulate - so the likelihood may be completely off the radar, but just suppose...
Let's say it's mild out - and reset says the supply water temperature needs to be 120, and you've set the Delta-T to 30 degrees. That would mean the pump would run at a certain speed in order to bring the return water back at 90 degrees. As TRV's close - as in completely closed - the BumbleBee will slow down accordingly. When the last TRV's closes completely, the pump will be running very slowly. Now there's no flow. The pump will run at that same speed until the it senses that return water temperature dropping. It's not moving, after all, so it will probably drop some. The pump will try to get that return temp back up by ramping up -- slowly. Once one of the TRV's opens up again - the sensors will get a reading of return water temp changes, and the pump will do what it needs to do.
Again, this is one of those occurrences that is mostly theoretical - and if it does happen, the time period is wicked short.
How would a Delta-P circulator handle this same situation? Look at a Delta P pump curve chart. Delta-P pumps work on a fixed pump curve -- they're funny looking pump curves, but they're fixed. Even the Alpha - it has a range where it operates, and changes are based on pre-programmed algorithms - but it's still a pump curve. If all of the TRV's are closed, the Delta-P pump will work at the spot where the low end of the pump curve intersects the 0 GPM line - it's a fair bet the BumbleBee would be running at a lower speed because the pump adjusts to what the system needs, with a constantly-adjusting pump curve. Check the Delta-P curves to see where that intersection point is.
The other thing to remember, a Delta-P pump runs the same speed in January as it does in November.
There's lots to digest here, but at the very least you guys helped me write a new blog post! I don't check here very often, but if you have any questions, please email me directly at firstname.lastname@example.org
T ShirtIn November the heat loss is generally much less than in January when you are more inclined to get to design days or pretty close. I don't need the same flows and I don't have a need to pull out a tremendous amount of btu/hr so my emitters are not sucking them out at the same rate they would be in January. Pump head is the same to a point no matter the heat loss so the only change is btu/hr pulled out of the conveyor belt. It is also less likely that multiple zones are open simultaneously."The bitter taste of a poor installation remains much longer than the sweet taste of the lowest price."
We've got a winner!!!I would have hoped you got that one right Chris!!!! E-mail me your size and address and we'll hook you up...
Thanks John!I'm thinking when the ODR lowers the water temp in November it will become increasingly harder to have the radiation 'give up' the BTU's to hit the same delta T as at design temperature, right? EDR charts show that.
At a certain point on a warmer day I could see the pump slowing to nothing to even hit the differential.
hasn't happened yet...Have had a BumbleBee of various generations in my house for 3 winters now - with outdoor reset, panel rads and TRV's -- hasn't happened yet. System doesn't deliver much heat in November because not very much is needed. Nor has it happened in any of the test sites used during the 3-year development of the Bumblebee, nor have we seen it happen in any of the installation since its release.
With all due respect...As the TRVs throttle down, the return temperature from their circuits would DROP, not rise. The whole reason why TRVs work is that they lower the AWT across the emitter. They do this by restricting flow - same as the Bumblebee. The only way the temperature should rise is if there's a bypass and enough flow goes through the bypass to make up for the cooler (but less) flow from the throttled emitters. Your one zone that's not on a TRV is probably acting as this bypass, so it's getting more than its share of flow until the thermostat is satisfied. I guess that works well enough if that one zone is relatively large compared to the rest of the system and the piping can accommodate the extra flow. It still seems plain that the Bumblebee could interpret a "call for no heat" (that is, the TRV acting to drop the AWT and, consequently, LWT) as a "call for heat", and that the two devices would apparently be at cross-purposes.
The usual design goal behind constant circulation is not electrical efficiency, as you seem to allude. With constant circulation, electrical efficiency becomes much more important, but fuel efficiency and comfort are typically touted as the prime motivators behind constant circulation, as those factors tend to outweigh electrical energy usage in a typical system. If they didn't, constant temperature operation at highest possible water temperature would still be the optimal choice, as that leads to shortest cycles and least electrical consumption.
EDIT: Actually, STEAM or gravity circulation would be the optimal choice - you can have that with no electrical usage at all!This post was edited by an admin on February 19, 2013 8:25 AM.
respect dueAck - major typo there (and it was mid-day!) Fixed it - thanks :)
Still one issue left...The return temperature dropping would widen the delta-T and actually cause a delta-T circ to speed up, rather than slow down.
GORDANthat is if your supply temp stays the same. the pump is following the delta-t, if the return is droping the supply prolly is too. am i understanding u right?
Not sure why that would beThe supply is maintained relatively constant by the boiler.
I Always UseRadiator valves with built in bypass on them with panel rads. Page V-3, part numbers 1057 and 1058.
Your return water would be dropping much slower as the flow of the panel rad is much less then the by pass or could be the same. I don't see the pump having to ramp very much. Your still going to need to do the math and the by pass is still a TEE..
Flow is 2gpm to the by pass and the rad only wants 1gpm. Supply Water temp is 140. System designed for a 30 degree delta.
(140 x 1) + (110 x 1) = 2X
320/2 = X
Still above my 30 delta....What has to change? Why does it change? Can't change supply water temp."The bitter taste of a poor installation remains much longer than the sweet taste of the lowest price."This post was edited by an admin on February 19, 2013 7:56 PM.
Not sureChris, not sure whether this is a reply to my post above. If so, I did specifically point out that the system return temperature could be expected to potentially go up with a bypass. This would then be interpreted by the controller as a signal to slow down, if there's enough flow bypassed by the TRVs. Eventually, the circ and the TRVs would settle into an equilibrium. This seems like a good combination and, in fact, might be a better match for systems that are pumping through the boiler, depending on just how quickly the circulator responds (you wouldn't want to underpump through the heat exchanger - it would be nice to have some sort of "min GPM" and "max GPM" parameter that you could set to your heat exchanger's requirements.)
Your RightThe circ would slow down and your delta across the rad would increase since it has the larger pressure drop. So what happens when the delta gets larger? Your panel rad thermostatic is going to open wider and allow for more flow which means flow through the bypass decreases.
This demonstrates why the Bumble Bee in my opinion is a better pump then an Alpha. It reacts to changes in the system btu/hr delivery, the Alpha does not.
Apples and orangesI'm not sure how you can claim that a dP circ combined with two-way TRVs does not react to changes in the system btu/hr delivery. The TRV does this locally for each zone or emitter, and the dP circ provides the aggregate flow required by all the zones. dP circulators and pressure bypasses are not a typical combination because those two devices work at cross-purposes... either the pressure bypass would never allow the circ to meet its pressure differential setpoint or the circ would never allow the pressure bypass to get activated.
Now, a pressure bypass (or three-way TRVs) with a dT circ is a different story. Particularly the latter. But that's not the application we were discussing; in addition, see my response to John for more questions about the benefits of maintaining a constant dT in the system. (Maybe dT-v would be a good addition to the algorithm, allowing the target dT to increase with the circulator's duty point?)This post was edited by an admin on February 20, 2013 11:30 AM.
Snapshots & moviesHi Gordan –
Had to laugh at your opening line – can’t hear or read “with all due respect” without thinking of Ricky Bobby!
I think if you look at a snapshot in time, you’re very correct about how TRV’s affect AWT in a panel radiator. But think about what causes a single TRV to “throttle down?” The thermostatic head is getting closer to being satisfied – meaning it’s getting warmer in the room – meaning less output is needed from the radiator – meaning your reaching a point of relative equilibrium for the radiator - meaning fewer BTU’s are being taken out of the fluid – at that particular snapshot in time.
Give it a minute – and that equation will change.
Nothing remains static for very long in a panel radiator system. That TRV continues modulating in an effort to maintain a comfort level in the room. And what’s more – every other TRV in the house is doing the same darn thing, all based on their own settings, heat loads, radiators sizes, etc.
Cross purposes? If you look at one snapshot in time – yeah, you’re probably right. But heating systems are more like a full-length feature film than a snapshot. Look at what happens over the course of 10 minutes, 30 minutes or two hours, and consider what’s going on with all the radiators in the entire system (their TRV’s are probably doing different things at different times), and remember that a Delta-T circulator reads the difference between the water temperature going out to the system and the water temperature coming back from the system – key word being “system” – and will vary its speed to maintain that overall system Delta-T. If one radiator out of a dozen has a closing TRV, I can’t see that it would “confuse” a Delta-T circulator.
One more note – the circulator doesn’t care what the supply water temperature is – just the difference. Set that Delta-T for what makes the most sense for the application.
And just for giggles – since it’s about 4 degrees here in Minnesota today – I shut off the open radiator in the family room, turned my BumbleBee on continuous and let it operate on just the TRV’s on the rest of the radiators. Nothing blew up, the circulator hummed along between 9 and 14 watts (that I recorded – may have gone lower or higher while I was in the can), the boiler was happy and the downstairs (except the family room) was fine. Left it like this for about 4 or 5 hours. I don’t know what that means, but it means something…
At the end of the day, it’s kinda hard to get around the simple fact that GPM = BTUH ÷ (DT × 500).
BTW – I think you misread something. I said that people tend to like continuous circulation systems for electrical “simplicity,” not electrical efficiency. No relays, no thermostats, etc makes for a pretty simple system. That said – my own personal opinion – and it’s just that, my opinion – is that I’d just as soon turn a pump off when I don’t need any heat. With properly sized heat emitters and outdoor reset – you’re gonna have fairly long on times, anyway…
I get that the room will be getting warmerAnd therefore, for any given AWT, the emitter will have a harder time rejecting heat into the room. But I'd expect those differences in room temperature to be small relative to the differences between the "ideal" supply water temperature (leading to no throttling) and the system supply water temperature - after all, the TRV is keeping the temperature in the room relatively constant. It's a dynamic system, to be sure, and it's not easy to mentally keep track of all the variables. But there are two kinds of dynamic systems: balanced ones, which typically have some sort of negative feedback that pushes everything to equilibrium, and unbalanced ones that feature positive feedback of some sort that leads to extremes. Imagine the case where the outdoor reset curve is set too high for the conditions so all the TRVs are throttling. In that case, the system delta T has to widen in order for the rooms to not overheat. Flow would drop rapidly with a dP circulator but wouldn't a dT circulator actually up its duty point in order to bring the delta T back to the configured value? This is what I mean by stating that the two devices would appear to work at cross purposes, whereas a dP circulator naturally and directly responds to the TRV's action in the correct way. Admittedly, I'm using a contrived example to illustrate my point, but I believe that it is a valid point: left to their own devices, the TRV (without bypass) and the dT circulator are not a natural pairing.
In a more realistic setting, we would be dealing with an optimized reset curve, so those TRVs should remain relatively open. But, by maintaining a fixed dT, doesn't a dT circulator force the system supply to be bumped higher to achieve the same AWT and, therefore, equivalent heat output from the emitters? And it does this by restricting flow, which is equivalent to what would happen if you bumped up the reset curve on a dP-circulated system and let the TRVs do the flow restriction. In both those cases, the circs will operate at a lower duty point than if the reset curve were optimal with a floating dT. And in both those cases, the same system dT will result. And in both those cases, it would seem that the benefit of a reduced system return water temperature would not extend to the boiler return water temperature because, having constant flow through the boiler loop, constant heat output, and a constant supply setpoint that it's maintaining, it follows that the boiler return (mixed boiler supply and system return) would be the same in both cases. The same is true with pumping through the boiler. So then, the question is: does it make sense to bump up the supply temperature in order to obtain a lower return temperature, but at a lower flow? And to what extent, if any, does it make sense to do that?
You're right......it is a contrived example, and contrived examples ALWAYS make one's point ;-)
I mean, who would contrive an example that disproves his point?
Delta-P was designed for this type exact application - and it works very well, there' sn o dispute there.. But Delta-T works well in this situation, too. As I said, I lived with the exact example you mention yesterday, just to see what would happen - a fairly realistic setting. Was it an entire heating season? No, just one freakin' cold day in Minnesota. The circulator seemed to be just fine with it all...because one TRV does not a system make. There are a bunch of them...and water temperature doesn't make them throttle, room temperature in the vicinity of the operating head does. And I'll bet dollars to donuts my ODR curve is probably a bit high for the real heat loss of the house. I calculated it to 44,000, but I'll bet it's lower than that in reality...
And again, the Delta-T pump does not set or control the supply water temperature - that may be the element you're missing - it doesn't even care what the supply water temperature is. It only cares about the Supply-Return difference. BTU requirements change - if the Delta-T is maintained, the system flow rate will change accordingly.
I think, Gordan, we may be at the point where we shake hands and agree to disagree...This post was edited by an admin on February 20, 2013 12:29 PM.
not contrived"Admittedly, I'm using a contrived example to illustrate my point..."
I do not feel it is contrived at all. Perhaps one is dealing with a significant solar gain issue. Let's say you have a well balanced home run panel rad system connected to a modulating heat source. Normally, a tuned ODR curve keeps the system in equilibrium with long cycles infrequently interrupted by the thermostat. But the southern exposure of this solar orientated home seems to get clobbered. TRVs are employed on half the rads to solve the problem. What happens when the sun hits the glass? The rads on the south side throttle down flow to reduce their AWTs. The rads on the north side must logically increase their AWTs to balance the bumblebee's fixed delta T enforcement. North side overheats. The thermostat, probably located in the center of the house, ends the call for heat. The same problem, but in reverse, happens for a windchill at night.
Both a fixed speed pump and fixed delta T pump will suffer to a degree from this problem, but a fixed delta P pump will not. (The optimal ODR curve is different though.)
Suppose a bypass is employed. This implies one is pumping water that doesn't get used. And, if the bypass is at the rads, the thermal distribution losses on the returns are being raised unnecessarily. For a single distribution pump solution at the residential level, surely any possible electrical efficiency gains of a couple ten's of watts are totally offset by these inherent disadvantages when dealing with a system making extensive use of TRVs.
What about a more suitable system? Gordon's final question really launches this thread into a new subject: (suggest starting new thread)
"So then, the question is: does it make sense to bump up the supply
temperature in order to obtain a lower return temperature, but at a
lower flow? And to what extent, if any, does it make sense to do that?"
When does it make sense to use a fixed delta T, a fixed delta P, or a fixed speed? And why are these are only options? Surely neither of these schemes will produce the optimal solution as a given moment for a given system. What would? What hydraulic characteristics should we take note of? What variables should the pump measure? What parameters should be adjustable?This post was edited by an admin on February 20, 2013 6:11 PM.
John Barba, are you on here?Well, I guess you are.
I'm glad my question resulted in a good dialog.
I think a really killer product would be micro Delta T circulators, John.
Imagine a fractional to maybe 2 gpm pump that could be attached to current distribution manifolds. Each set to the particulars of the various emitters in the system. About the price of a Sentry zone valve.
Be pretty cool.
Mini-pumpJust need to get that machine from "Honey, I Shrunk The Kids"....
Big dreams, little pumps...It will happen. Look at what happened to boilers...
BTW - Gennady is showing off a BumbleBee in this most unlikely post:
He has a link to a nice gallery of his work and features a Bee in one of them.
ECM micro circsare probably in our future. There are a couple in the EU market but they aren't sold here.
I'm envisioning something that runs on 24 VAC and tops out around 2-3 Watts. Small enough to mount on a manifold, internal ∆T control plus some kind of network connection. Full BACnet or LON would be overkill here, but an inexpensive field bus akin to 1-wire that would allow control and monitoring would be great. Imagine a smart micro LoadMatch...
TechnologyI think companies like Taco are only handicapped by the market itself. They have the resources to produce very advanced technologies. Getting them accepted in the market is another story. People don't change what they've done for years.
Very wellsaid!Always keep learning: observing what works, and what doesn't. Ask questions
That sounds rightI stopped in a supply house yesterday to order a few things. Mostly a forced air supplier with a little area for hydronics. They had a stack of 3 speed pumps.
I asked if he knew anything about the BumbleBee or the Alpha. Never heard of either. Said guys here just "keep it simple" and that I probably knew more than most techs in area.
Scary, since I sell carabiners and ropes.
Change is hard.
Think About ThisThere are roughly 12-16 guys that regularly post, help and share. I'll call them the ground troops in the trenches. You get a few manufactures that respond when necessary such as in this thread and a rep hear or there. Other then Bob Eck I don't think I've seen or heard from anyone that works in a local supply house.
This site is such a valuable tool for someone that WANTS to learn and it's a shame it isn't taken advantage of more. I work for a rather large HVAC distributor. I could walk into any one of our branches and not one counter guy or salesman ever visit this site nor others like it such as the Taco Neighborhood nor would they even know about them. Why? It's not because they haven't been provided the information, it's because supply houses are changing into McDonalds and Burger King. Point to the number you want I'll give it to you? What's the guy down the streets price? I'll match or beat it. Why is this?
In my opinion it's because the majority of contractors do the same thing. What do you want Mrs Smith, I'll get it..What was the other guys price? I'll match it. In this sea of hydronics there are few fish that get it compared to the thousands of minnows.
Until the minnows evolve and there are enough fish, technology in our industry will continue to evolve as fast as a snail moves.The biggest reason for the explosion of high efficiency and few evolved changes we have seen has been 90% driven by the consumer forcing the change in contractors not contractors working as an industry to make the change.
Thank you to the internet and sites such as this because without them we would still be stuck in 50's technology.
I'm done ranting now..
There is a pointwhen the heat output from a convector drops quickly at low supply temperatures. Output charts show this clearly. So if you are running a system on ODR and forcing a ∆T would you not at some point run out of "driving temperature" and virtually no heat output from the panel rads or fin tube? Even in mild weather conditions buildings need some heat.
It seems manufacturers like Jaga and Runtal have keyed into that concept and now offer small fan assist rads to be used at low supply temperatures, realizing that forcing the convection (air movement across the fins) can compensate for the low temperature operation.
Solar, GEO, and mod cons are ideal low supply temperature generators. To leverage their efficiency low temperature operation is the key.
For years, decades really, companies like tekmar have schooled us on the near ideal reset curve, which almost perfectly matches the heat loss of a building. If you plot that "ideal curve" along side a curve with a forced ∆T the heat output "droop" is considerable at low supply temperatures. Pay attention to that with convection type emitters. Not so much on a radiant slab where the heat transfer is mainly radiant and MRT works to your favor.
I agree there is a time and place for ∆T function pumps, I can't see them being the ideal logic for all circ applications. It behoves the installer and designer to run some numbers, use the data and experience from the pioneers and base the component selection on the combination of the above.
To say one technology is better, or smarter than the other seems to limit your ability to offer both :)
HI HRI've seen those plots as well...and one thing I can't quite figure out, and what no one has been able to adequately explain to me...is that heat output droops with a fixed speed circulator as well and, according to the charts, would't "work."
Not sure what that means, but it must mean something...
HR said what I was trying to say..."There is a point when the heat output from a convector drops quickly at low supply
temperatures. Output charts show this clearly. So if you are running a
system on ODR and forcing a ∆T would you not at some point run out of
"driving temperature" and virtually no heat output from the panel rads
or fin tube? Even in mild weather conditions buildings need some heat."
I would think version 2.0 of the Delta T circs are going to interface with the ODR, or incorporate ODR into the pump itself. It doesn't make sense to enforce the very specific design delta T throughout the entire season's worth of varying heating curves.
I've seen ODR supply temps at 105F. To reduce return temps to 85 degrees system wide is not going to be efficient.
Having said all of that, I think my current monstrosity of a 5 pump monoflow system would probably buzz along pretty sweetly most times on 5 BumbleBees because each pump would be adjusting to each individual zone's particular efficiencies and deficiencies.
The pressure will not change, so no need of delta P adjustments, but the cast iron convectors on one circuit definitely don't give up the BTU's as fast as the 3 column radiators on another zone.
Be really neat if I could get it down to 4 zones with the Bees mounted to a Caleffi Hydrolink ;-)
I have to DisagreeA heating system source of heat is predicated on the heat loss at design temp. The water temp from the heat source is designed based on the needed water temp to over come that heat loss based on the delivery of a specific flow rate to deliver the btu/hr needed through a heat emitter. All of this is predicated on the universal hydronic formula of gpm = btuhr/ (delta-t x 500).
If I can deliver the proper btu/hr at design I can deliver it at any given time. The pump will move the btu/hr I need. It doesn't care about a specific water temp. It is the designers responsibility to make sure the emitter can take the btu/hr from the conveyor belt.
This is a heating system and as a friend says, not the space shuttle we are building.
truebut the fixed speed circs are not being marketed as as "smart" circ. If the installer is to pay 2 or 3 times as much for an intelligent circ, then it needs to be able to perform magic. Well near magic.
If in the case of ODR controlled systems the smarter circ cannot offer better low temperature performance, under some conditions, then leave that out and focus on what it can add or offer, and the Bee seems to have plenty to offer.
So "Bee" it.
Tru dat!Just because the pump is "smart," it doesn't mean the person using it doesn't need to be!
Speaking words of wisdomlet it bee, let it bee :)
This is GreatThere are many lessons to be learned on this thread. One of the them is how two different mfg's can come together and provide excellent thoughts and insight in a great debate. Thanks HR and JB. Can't wait to get to ISH and see everything we want here and can't have. :)
Take a pictureOf a mini circulator for me!
Now that's what I'm talking about, Hot RodThey make so much sense.
In the picture on the left, do you know what sized pipe that it is attached to for some sense of scale?
On the right it looks like a Wilo display.
Wilo displayGeniax is a jaw-dropper http://productfinder.wilo.com/repo/Graphics/00473791_0.pdf
That is a well developed system already...Thanks SWEI !
I have always thought that radiant pex manifolds are analogous to electrical panels that are feeding circuits by Romex cable. Distributing the energy captured in the water.
Looks like an electric distribution system.
Mix-spelled German conference...It should be called WISH, cause you won't be seeing most of those products on this side of the pond. Too many lawyers.
But you WILL see lots of good free beer :-)
MEIt's not so much a case of "You got what you paid for", as it is a matter of "You DIDN'T get what you DIDN'T pay for, and you're NOT going to get what you thought you were in the way of comfort". Borrowed from Heatboy.
I have used the Bee anddelta-p both and I love them each and every one for who they Bee;) This Bee word is gonna go over big! The only Bee sting I got was when the sensor plug came loose from it's socket, generating a no heat call at 9 pm. on a cold windy night. I put it back in and it hasn't happened since. Probably didn't have it plugged in right in the first place.
Bumblebee issuesI have 2 Bee's to be used in my home heated with an Alpine 80.
I installed the first one on the primary boiler zone in the fixed "CP" mode. I did this as the graph showed speed 2 to fit the requirements of 5' of head and 4.2 GPM. for a D/T of 35* The LED does show 22 Watts which is correct for speed 2 but the GPM shows 9.5GPM. That is over 100% error. Is the accuracy of the GPM readout really that unreliable? I even throttled the ball valve back a bit and the GPM readout actually went up and the wattage went down to 14. I just want to make sure that I am flowing te correct rate on the primary of the P/S plumbed setup.
My plan was to use the two of them on the two larger zones of my three zone house in the D/T mode. There is some repipeing yet to be done to the zones so I though I'd use one temporarly on the Primary to see how well it worked.
Has anyone had experience with these pumps to see if the PM readout is so error prone?
Thanks for any thoughts,
what's your ∆T on high fire?can't speak to the display accuracy, but the boiler controls should tell you what the water temps are. Adjust the pump speed until you get what you want.
Yes, thank you I do understand that but am not sure about secondary interference. Will not the zone's effect the the boiler rise? It seems that if I am flowing less than the boiler with one zone on or flowing all zones with more than the primary it will effect the rise. I was going to do as you suggest, as I have a clamp on digital temp meter that reads D/T, but wasn't sure what do do with the zones.
sorrythought this was on a boiler loop. Why not just leave the circ in ∆T mode?
D/TI had thought about that but am not sure of the reliability of the D/T mode with the use of sensors and all. That would be the way to go as it would keep D/T's the same no matter what the output. I just don't think that is a safe way to go in this new operating mode till its proven. Any thoughts?
∆T circshave been around long enough. ECM circs have been around long enough. No reason not to trust the combination of the two.
Setting primary flowI am still a little uncomfortable using D/T as there is no way to set a min flow as a backup. I would like to set it by firing the boiler on high fire and setting the flow to get the 35* D/T as shown in the Alpine manual. My confusion comes with what to do with the secondary zones. Do they all have to be running?
TomThis post was edited by an admin on April 18, 2013 10:01 AM.
How Can Youever get a delta t of 35 degrees on the boiler loop alone? The only way this kind of a delta t is possible is when a heating or other load is taking enough energy to get down to this level. Even with a "normal" heating loop, such a delta t is not likely.
I believe this is why boiler makers send such powerful pumps with their boilers. Many situations just don't make for the desired high delta t's.
They ProvideThe pump sizes they do because they are scared of who is installing them. By sizing the boiler pump for a smaller flow rate (large rise) it gives you the best chance of removing the btu/hr created by the boiler to the system side when piped pri/sec. The only time you need the full btu/hr out put of any boiler is when you are at design conditions and every single zone is calling.
The majority of the time the system cannot pull out the flow that carries the made btu/hr out of the boiler. No matter the rise chosen the only time you are going to get the full temp rise no matter a 20,25,30,35 is when you are under total design conditions unless that boiler flow matches what the system side is taking making the system delta-t the same. Its the flow the boiler pump is making that you want to be able to pull out to the system. Because what you can't pull out heads right for the boiler return.
Tom you cannot just open the zones. Use the charts for gpm and head and choose the correct curve. Unless today it's your coldest day of the year and the space needs heat you can't pull out the btu/hr created. You will never see a 35 degree rise!This post was edited by an admin on April 19, 2013 11:48 AM.
Thank you for the reply. I do have a pump that has a curve that matches the required flow for a 30* D/T.
I don't understand your statement:
"Unless today it's your coldest day of the year and the space needs heat you can't pull out the btu/hr created"
I don't unerstand what the OAT has to do with it. If its 60* outside and its 68* inside and I set all 3 Tstats to 72 and manually set the boiler to high fire with a water temp of design day, lets say 160 should I not be able to monitor the boiler rise and confirm my pump is pumping the correct amount? Yes, I realize it will not take very long to satify the Tstats, but it should be long enough to to the test.
You have a far greater understanding of these systems than I, and realize I am probably missing something.
TomThis post was edited by an admin on April 20, 2013 9:01 AM.
BecauseThere is no way in gods creation the emitter can pull out the btu/hr being delivery through the distribution system. If you don't pull out the btu/hr you don't cool the water so the delta across the zone will be small. Plus the pump is going to tell you how many gpm it's moving. Though not accurate, still a glitch in reading gpm accurately.This post was edited by an admin on April 20, 2013 9:20 AM.
Taco Claims the GPMreadout on the Bumblebee to inaccurate, an estimate at best.
I agree that it is impossible to get the 35 degree drop in any standard heating loop, unless it's so long that the room to room temp difference will be noticeable.
Chris and ced48Chris,
If all zones are on, and the house is over raidited with 198' of standart BB and 24' of Hicap, why won't I be able to pull all the btu's from the 80?
We are talking aout a D/T on the boiler loop not the zone side.
The Boiler Loopon it's own can't possibly loose 35 degrees as it spins around a 10 foot loop, with nothing but the bare pipe as a heat remover, Can it? Please, someone explain if it can-