Joined on August 29, 2011
Last Post on April 1, 2013
@ April 1, 2013 1:00 PM in Calculating propane for tanklessis probably keeping more than a few people from switching from fuel oil to propane. Instead of bailing out banksters, the feds should be handing out zero or low interest loans to customers like yours and folks who want to switch to propane to purchase tanks. Every gallon of fuel oil replaced by propane reduces our trade imbalance by over $2 at current crude prices. Not to mention the reduction in CO2, SO2, NOx etc. emissions.
@ April 1, 2013 12:48 PM in Calculating propane for tanklessThat's why it's wholesale. I'm just saying there's a lot of room in the price. I personally think 100%+ markup on a product you just have to drop off and don't have to warranty is a tad excessive.
@ April 1, 2013 12:07 AM in Calculating propane for tanklessstill making an almost 100% markup on you...
@ March 29, 2013 5:52 PM in Retrofit/upgrade suggestionsI just went through all that on my house. Had the original 1931 coal fired boiler that had been converted to run on oil in 1941.
I tried to sell the house a couple years back and the old boiler and asbestos wrapped gravity pipes hanging down a foot from the basement ceiling were total deal breakers. I didn't get a single offer. It's a really nice house, too. Originally built by Bill Boeing. Yes, the founder of the Boeing airplane company.
One must remember that the number of people willing to buy a house that old in spite of it's charm is pretty low and the number of people willing to buy one with the old gravity set-up still in place is absolutely minuscule. Consider yourself one in a million.
I'd consider it a "hedge" to change it out to a more modern system. You never know if/when you're going to have to get out from a place in a hurry. Having the old system in there can make it nearly impossible.
Also, the modern system will just plain work better. A lot less expansion and contraction noises. Almost no temperature swings etc. For me, it was almost worth it for that alone.
Just my 2 cents.
@ March 28, 2013 2:39 AM in Installing a new hot water system myselfWith the type and amount of radiation you're speaking of, Chris is absolutely correct, you'll only get 50K BTU/hr out of the CH-210. He just didn't explain why. I've done that for you above. I think you owe him an apology...
I would encourage the original poster to start a new thread and ask the question again so that it may be answered by pros without the noise of this one.
@ March 28, 2013 2:21 AM in Installing a new hot water system myselfyou do understand that the 11 GPM flow rates are through the DHW heat exchanger at a 90 psi pressure drop, right?
The heating system side will not flow any more than 5 GPM through the primary (combustion) side.
I know this to be true because Navien sent me their pressure curves and pressure drop test spreadsheets.
If you truly do need 163k BTU of heat out of that unit, the only way you'll get it with that unit is with a metric crapload of radiation (1 metric crapload = 1.15 standard craploads).
The CH-240 unit won't do you any better as it only burns more fuel than the CH-210. All of the other parts (pump, heat exchangers etc. are the same part numbers).
I seriously hope you haven't started to put this together yet as it just plain will not heat your house properly on a design day unless you have enough radiation that you can heat your house at design temperature with an average emitter temperature of 110*. That pretty much means you'll need to have VERY well designed in floor radiation.
The emitters you've chosen output 740 BTU/hr/ft at a 180* avg temperature. There is no way on God's green earth that the Navien CH-210 will do that for you. Those emitters put out 200 BTU/hr/ft at 110* average temp. Do you have enough space for 4 times the radiation you planned on?
This isn't religion, it's physics. It's not subject to interpretation.
With the system you describe, you'll be sleeping alone in a very a very cold house...
PS, I have a CH-210 and like it very much. It's just that my heat loss is round 60K and I have a metric crapload of cast iron radiation...
@ March 28, 2013 1:31 AM in Customers are confused when it comes to gas conversions...That every dollar you don't spend on oil is a dollar that doesn't go on the wrong side of our trade balance. It stays right here in the US of A, getting spent over and over again on everything from drilling gear to pork chops. Mmmmm, pork chops!
@ March 27, 2013 8:30 PM in Calculating Heat Loss Using Past Usagedoes account for passive solar heating which sounds to me to be good for overall yearly energy use but will probably skew your actual heat loss numbers down from what they actually are, especially at night.
@ March 27, 2013 5:34 PM in One Rad hydronic systemor would convection/gravity do the trick?
@ March 27, 2013 4:14 PM in Customers are confused when it comes to gas conversions...Look at the price they're getting for it at the well head, ~ $3.50 MM BTU.
Check out this chart for residential oil and propane prices, http://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/pet_pri_wfr_dcus_nus_w.htm
All this with a huge reduction in nat gas rigs over the last couple of years.
The extraction technology is getting better every year and the "extractors" are figuring out better ways to maximize gas production from each well every month.
The nat gas prices you'll be paying in Jan of 2015 have probably already been set by futures contracts. I fully expect to be paying less in 2015 than i'm paying now. My rates have gone down in the last 2 years.
The price is 50% higher on the east coast because of pipeline capacity issues, not abundance issues. Those pipeline capacity issues are being rectified right now.
You go ahead and go long on nat gas prices and you'll be in the poor house before you know it...
@ March 25, 2013 6:34 PM in Navien Combi BoilersContinues to work very well after 2 heating seasons. Not a single issue not involving the biological interface :)
I figure over those two heating seasons I've saved 3-4 times the cost of the "combination heating unit" itself in fuel cost and efficiency (changed from oil to gas). Not a bad ROI...
@ February 25, 2013 4:17 PM in The elegance of simplicity has it been lost?How about the fact that mod/cons can make an 80+ year old high mass system work like the dead men designed it to work while polluting 99.9% less than when originally used?
Those systems were designed to have a coal fire lit at the beginning of the heating season and kept burning until the end of the heating season. Modulation was done by the size of the fire. Fine tuning the temperature was accomplished with windows. The flue gas contained all sorts of nasty components like SO2, CO, UHCs, particulates, NOx, LOTS of CO2, etc.
Along came oil with a fixed nozzle and burn rate causing what I consider to be one of the most annoying "system working fine" issues: radiator and piping expansion noises. I believe that's called "setting it up bang-bang"? However, along with the "Bang-Bang" we got stop stoking coal fires, much less SO2, UHCs, particulates, CO, and about 20% less CO2. NOx emissions are about the same with oil as coal.
Now natural gas is the primary heating fuel and with that we get further pollution reductions: 30% in CO2, 80% NOx, and essentially a 100% reduction in SO2 and particulates.
With all the "new fangled" technology, we now have components available at an unbelievably low cost that will replicate the heat flow of those earlier coal boilers.
I recently replaced an original coal boiler which had been converted to oil to a new mod/con. I now no longer have radiator and piping expansion noises and I saved well over 100% of the cost of the new mod/con in fuel the first heating season. Even if I'd had someone else install it my payback would have been 3-4 years.
I think it's also wise to remember that every BTU not burned is a BTU not imported. Every molecule of CO2 not emitted is one that doesn't have to be dealt with in the future. Every bit of SO2 and NOx not emitted doesn't end up coming back as acid rain.
It could very well be that we're just trading dollars, i.e., fuel cost for maintenance, but in my book that's just fine. I'd much rather give one of the pros on this board $1000 than to middle eastern states. Keeping the money here means it multiplies and helps our overall economy.
Also, there's always fear, doubt and ignorance whenever new technology "invades" an industry.
I owned an auto repair business when electronic carburetors and electronic fuel injection became common in automobiles. There was a lot of resistance at first from both automobile owners and mechanics. It was perceived as unnecessary by most people but pollution regulators and environmentalists. To the average person their really wasn't any difference except that performance was reduced. Fuel mileage nor efficiency increased. But that wasn't the design goal. Pollution reduction was.
Now fast forward 35 years. Overall efficiency is much better and automobile pollution is drastically reduced. True there were a lot of teething pains to get here but we got here none the less.
The argument that automobiles don't really get any better mileage is really a non sequitor. We're comparing apples to oranges. The current Honda Civic is actually much bigger, faster, safer etc. than the 80's Civic. The only thing remotely similar is the name and the fact that it's an automobile. One has to understand that cars have greatly increased in weight relative to the size. 99.99999% don't realize that a 1955 Chevy 2-dr weighed in at 3055 lbs while a 2012 Toyota Prius weighs in at 3042 lbs. The Prius gets 45 MPG in town while the Chevy could get maybe 15 MPG in town and the Prius is much, much safer. I'd say that's an enormous improvement. If anyone here thinks it's not, I'd love to hear your argument.
My point is that technology marches on. While there may be periods of "teething pains", fear and doubt, in the end technology usually proves to be very beneficial. I think one notable exception may be social media... ;)
I'm guessing this industry is somewhere near the state the auto industry was in 30 years ago. Buckle up ya'll, you're in for a bit of a ride...
@ February 25, 2013 3:28 PM in The elegance of simplicity has it been lost?respectfully disagree that your analogy is appropriate.
The primary goal of a bomber is to be able to get to a target and avoid being shot down before it can drop it's payload.
The flying wing is a more efficient layout than a convention design, therefore giving the bomber more range to get to it's target. This is made possible by computer control of the wing control surfaces.
The sharp, irregular shapes give it it's stealthiness, therefore making the bomber less susceptible to being shot down before reaching it's target. This is also made possible by computer control of the wing control surfaces.
The point I'm making here is there was a design goal that could only be met with complex computer control. The human body just plain can't react quickly enough to control such an aerodynamically unstable design.
Your argument is akin to saying that we shouldn't use levers to lift objects that are heavier than a man can lift.
While many homeowners may be intimidated by complex systems, the same can be said with other technology that get's used every day such as tablet computers. You may be fine with a tablet computer but others may not.
There was also a time when most white males were absolutely terrified of blacks and women voting...
@ February 24, 2013 2:57 PM in Ch240 remote installI'd be pretty confident in betting your guy never did a heat loss.
The normal order in a proper design would be to do a heat loss calculation and then measure the amount of radiation to determine what kind of water temps you need to run. This will determine what kind of equipment you can run.
On this board, you'll read over and over again that the main ingredient in a successful install is the installer himself. I couldn't agree more.
I'm curious, why don't you have the original installer dial in the system to your satisfaction? That really should be part of the original install deal. I guess that's the difference between the lowest bid and the other bids...
The union joints at the meter do commonly leak. Here in Seattle the gas company has crews that go around and actually check meters for leaks once a year. They just fixed a leak in mine a few months ago.
A gas leak outside will not affect the flue (exhaust) gas composition unless the leak is so big the unit doesn't get enough gas to run.
Order the sensor today and you'll get it this week. Outdoor reset can give you up to 20% more efficiency. It pays for itself VERY quickly.
@ February 23, 2013 8:05 PM in Ch240 remote installThere is no way that unit should have any issues heating a 2200 sq ft house built in the 80's unless the temp got to -75*F. It should have at least twice the needed capacity. I have a built in 1930, 3,000 sq ft poorly insulated house in a fairly mild climate (Seattle) and my CH-210 never has any difficulties. I don't think it's ever run at over 40% fire to heat the house (23*F outside temp with 73* inside temp). It should be noted that i have about a ton or so of cast iron radiators. Definitely a high mass system.
What kind of emitters do you have? Baseboard? Flat panel? Floor heat? Sizes?
Was a heat loss calculation ever done?
If your pro didn't install the remote control and insist you get the outdoor sensor, he may not be very experienced with radiant systems. Any plumber or heating contractor can screw together parts, however, it takes someone with deep understanding to make a newer system like this work optimally.
Did you find the connectors to install the remote control yet? Have you ordered the outdoor temp sensor yet? Those items really help overall efficiency. The sensor is just over fifty dollars with a few dollars of wire needed to install it. You'll save that $50 in fuel in a month or two and have better comfort.
As to the exhaust and gas smell, that could be a very dangerous situation. I'm guessing your guy never checked the flue gas composition to make sure it was running right. My advice here would be to get someone else in asap with the proper leak detection equipment to get to the bottom of the smells.
Also, to your dhw time lag issue, I handled that by putting a small 10 gallon electric water heater inline as a buffer.
@ February 21, 2013 9:40 AM in Ch240 remote installhttp://lmgtfy.com/?q=What+advantages+does+outdoor+reset+provide%3F
Perhaps you could give us a description of your heating system (such as emmiter types, square footage of your home, insulation level, location).
I take it you installed this yourself?
Also, we like pictures!
@ February 21, 2013 8:43 AM in Ch240 remote installIs about 6ft long. As far as I recall, the wire wasn't inside the unit, it was with the blue pigtail used for the outdoor reset sensor (sold separately), which you should use.
If you don't have the orange wire, the connectors are standard Molex types that can be gotten at any Radio Shack/electrical supply house. Take the remote to your local Radio Shack and have them set you up with a couple of connectors that fit into the female end on the remote. Get yourself enough 18 AWG STRANDED wire to reach from your boiler to the desired remote location. I put mine in place of my old thermostat and use it for a high limit switch.
Again, you should use the outdoor reset. YOu can get the sensor here for around fiddy bux: http://bostonheatingsupply.com/nass9exos001.aspx
@ February 20, 2013 6:36 PM in Ch240 remote installthat the wire from the remote control is orange? The unit should have come with an orange wire with 2 male connectors on the ends. One end plugs into the remote and the other into the control board. Did you get the outdoor temp sensor so you can use outdoor reset?
@ February 20, 2013 2:58 PM in DanIt appears to me (cursory looksee) that any tracking from here is via google ads, not anything that Dan's techies are doing.
@ January 11, 2013 4:59 PM in Boilers for small apartmentsSetting it up with outdoor reset so that they only get enough heat with the windows closed to get the apartments to around 70* and then let them add their own electric heaters if they want more?
@ January 9, 2013 1:41 PM in Cost savings with gasI went from an 80 year old coal-converted-to-oil boiler to a gas fired mod/con. The way the old unit cycled I estimated that i was getting about 65% overall efficiency, maybe less. My new boiler with outdoor reset has seen a maximum return temp of 120*F so I'm figuring the efficiency is up over 95%. My last delivery of oil in the spring of 2011 was $5/gal. The equivalent BTUs in gas is about $1.50. Add that all together and I'm probably getting 5 times the heat for my fuel dollars.
And the CO2 emissions from my house have gone down by 2/3!
@ January 9, 2013 12:01 PM in The Tide is RollingJust may give the Niners a rematch! This weekend: go Niners and Hawks! Next weekend, go Hawks!